Month: October 2022

News

Uber is rolling out a new advertising branch, which will show riders live ads during their ride using data that Uber collects from their phones.

A father and son shot at a woman sitting in her car after their Ring camera notified them of someone at their front door. The person at their front door was their neighbor, dropping off a package sent to the wrong address.  

Apple rolled out new app store ads, allowing advertisements for apps on the store pages for other apps, but they paused gambling app ads after outcries from other developers. 

Events

On November 2nd, NYU’s Law will be hosting a panel called “FemTech and Privacy: Striking the Balance in a Post-Dobbs Reality.” The event will take place in the Greenberg Auditorium at 5:00 pm, and will be moderated by Professor Melissa Murray. The registration link is here, and the event description is as follows:

In the aftermath of the leaked Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, warnings to period tracking app users went viral. The message? Ditch them immediately. Weeks later, a New York Times headline countered, “Deleting Your Period Tracker Won’t Protect You.” Join us for a panel discussion with academic, innovation, and advocacy experts who will explore how exactly such data is already or could be used – and misused. What privacy laws or legislation can be leveraged to protect FemTech users? And why does menstrual literacy – with or without tech tools – matter more than ever in our post-Dobbs reality?

(Compiled by Student Fellow Batya Kemper)

Events

On November 2^nd, NYU’s Law will be hosting a panel called “FemTech and Privacy: Striking the Balance in a Post-Dobbs Reality.” The event will take place in the Greenberg Auditorium at 5:00 pm, and will be moderated by Professor Melissa Murray. The registration link is here, and the event description is as follows: 

In the aftermath of the leaked Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, warnings to period tracking app users went viral. The message? Ditch them immediately. Weeks later, a New York Times headline countered, “Deleting Your Period Tracker Won’t Protect You.” Join us for a panel discussion with academic, innovation, and advocacy experts who will explore how exactly such data is already or could be used – and misused. What privacy laws or legislation can be leveraged to protect FemTech users? And why does menstrual literacy – with or without tech tools – matter more than ever in our post-Dobbs reality?

News

The Biden Administration plans to start a labelling system for rating the cybersecurity of Internet of Things (IoT) devices. This labelling system is meant to help American consumers identify and purchase more secure tech.

In the aftermath of the Optus privacy breach, Digital Rights Watch Australia has advocated for reforms to Australia’s Privacy Act, which has an exemption for voter information kept by political parties. They argue that breach of this voter data could have dangerous social and political implications. For more on the issue, see this link. 

A new investigative report reveals that the company Equifax surveilled 1000 of its remote workers to assess their productivity. The company then fired 24 employees who were found to have been juggling two jobs. 

In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) ordered Facebook’s parent company Meta to sell GIPHY, one of its recent acquisitions. The CMA believed that Meta’s acquisition would give the company even more market power.

(Compiled by Student Fellow Kiana Boroumand)

On September 28, the EU Commission published a Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD, or AI Liability Directive). The purpose of the Directive is to “improve the functioning of the internal market by laying down uniform rules for certain aspects of non-contractual civil liability for damage caused with the involvement of AI systems.” 

On October 4, the EU Parliament voted to approve EU legislation that would standardize mobile charges to be USB Type-C starting in 2024. The legislation (which now only needs final approval by the EU Council) is intended to reduce e-waste, but also has significant implications on interoperability, especially for companies like Apple that make their own separate lightning chargers. Similar legislation for computer chargers may be forthcoming.  

Also on October 4, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released a “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People” describing five principles to “guide the design, use, and deployment of automated systems.” The OSTP has described the Blueprint as a non-binding “white paper” instead of official guidance. The Blueprint was also accompanied by a companion document, “From Principles to Practice: A Technical Companion to the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.” 

In Canada, the Edmonton police service has begun using DNA phenotyping to create computer-generated images of suspects. On October 4, Edmonton detectives utilized the Snapshot DNA Phenotyping Service from Parabon NanoLabs, a US-based DNA technology company. However, pushback led them to retract the computer-generated suspect image they had released two days later.  

On October 5, Joseph Sullivan, former chief security officer of Uber, was convicted of obstruction of proceedings and misprision of a felony regarding an attempted cover-up of a 2016 hack of Uber. He now faces a maximum of five years in prison for obstruction and three years for misprision. This is one of the first instances of criminal charges in response to a data breach. The case is U.S. v. Sullivan (9th Cir. 2022). 

On October 7, President Biden signed an executive order directing the steps the US will take to institute the pending EU-US Data Privacy Framework. While some US parties seem optimistic about the draft, other EU parties like data privacy activist Max Schrems are less so. 

Pending Cases

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Gonzalez v. Google LLC (9th Cir. 2021) in its current term, a case about whether Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act “immunizes interactive computer services when they make targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider, or only limits the liability of interactive computer services when they engage in traditional editorial functions (such as deciding whether to display or withdraw) with regard to such information.” The case was accepted by SCOTUS even though there is not a clear circuit split indicating a particular point of view. 

Gonzalez v. Google comes on the heels of two appellate court decisions about content moderation that have not been granted certiorari by SCOTUS, but which some think might in the future. They are NetChoice, LLC v. Attorney General, State of Florida (11th Cir. 2022), which struck down a Florida law restricting social media platforms’ ability to moderate content, and NetChoice v. Paxton (5th Cir. 2022), which conversely upheld a similar law in Texas.

There is a pending data protection case before the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) regarding the scope of damages for GDPR violations: UI v. Österreichische Post AG. An Advocate-General Opinion was issued on October 6 before the CJEU issues a final judgment: an analysis of the opinion by Max Schrems’ group noyb can be found here. 

US “crypto policy advocacy group” Coin Center is suing the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) over its sanctions of cryptocurrency mixer Tornado Cash. Complaint linked here; Ori Freiman’s take here. 

Upcoming Events

On November 2 at 5 pm EST, the Engelberg Center will host “FemTech and Privacy: Striking the Balance in a Post-Dobbs Reality,” a conversation exploring how FemTech data can be used, and the privacy laws and legislation that can be leveraged to protect users. The event will be in-person in Greenberg Lounge, Vanderbilt Hall. RSVP and more information here.

(Compiled by Student Fellow Toni Xu)

Yesterday, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy released its Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, which aims to embed protections throughout the AI design pipeline. The blueprint is centered on five principles, namely, rights to safe and effective systems; algorithmic discrimination protection; data privacy; notice and explanation; and human alternatives, consideration, and fallback.

Recently, concerns have been raised that corporations are outsourcing the work of data collection and training of machine learning models to academic non-commercial entities to avoid legal liability and accountability. These algorithms, such as Stable Diffusion and Google’s Imagen, may then be re-licensed for commercial use. 

After a months-long dispute, Elon Musk has agreed to go forward with a $44 billion buyout of Twitter for $54.20 per share, far above its market price, in order to preempt a trial connected to Musk’s attempt to walk away from the original deal. Twitter has yet to respond to the offer.

The Council of the European Union approved the Digital Services Act, which aims to regulate large digital providers and protect fundamental rights. It requires platforms and search engines to be more transparent, to design recommender systems not based on profiling, and to be accountable for their role in the dissemination of harmful content online. 

A provision of the Obama-era Cures Act intended to provide patients with direct access to their medical records has led some hospitals to send medical data and test results to patients before their doctors can consult with them. As a result, some are being confronted with stressful, traumatizing information and are left to process it alone.

The United Kingdom government has again paused its draft legislation of a data reform bill which is meant to replace the EU’s GDPR. The new prime minister Truss’ cabinet claims that this new legislation will eliminate bureaucratic red tape, though details of how exactly it will do so have yet to emerge.

The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection has given notice of a public hearing and opportunity to comment on proposed rules governing the use of automated tools in employment decisions. The hearing will take place on Monday, October 24^th, 2022.

Erick Adame, a Spectrum News NY1 meteorologist, was fired after someone sent pictures of him nude on an adult webcam site to his employer and mother. Adame’s firing has sparked outcry as he was the victim of revenge porn and so-called ‘morality clauses’ in contracts are disproportionately wielded against LGBTQ people like him.

(Compiled by Student Fellow Nicholas Tilmes)

Yesterday, the European Commission introduced a proposal for a new AI liability standard. This proposal consolidates the fragmented liability standards in effect in EU member countries. It has specific provisions for “lay[ing] down uniform rules for access to information and alleviation of the burden of proof in relation to damages caused by AI systems”. Existing EU-level legislation left out considerations for end-users, an omission which this proposal addresses.

Australia’s second largest telecommunications provider was breached this week. The hacker posted the information of 10,200 customers before apologizing and taking it down. A class action lawsuit may follow from this breach.

A new California law bars in-state companies and law enforcement from sharing abortion information requested by out-of-state warrants. It raises new legal questions for companies and sets up future legal battles, but furthers California’s goal of becoming a sanctuary for abortion-seekers.

The US Treasury Department issued guidance this week aimed at increasing internet service access for protestors in Iran. This update included new internet-related exceptions to Iranian sanctions, specifically expanding VPN, video-conferencing, and social media access.

The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act advanced out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. It would provide an antitrust exemption for news outlets to collectively bargain with tech platforms over pricing, terms, and conditions.

A modification to California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act was introduced in the New York state senate this week. This legislation would outlaw advertising and data mining targeting minors and would require a hotline for parents to report content related emergencies to tech platforms. It faces staunch opposition from tech lobbyists, as it is even stricter than its California equivalent.
A recent TikTok about Turo hosts mocking a customer’s driving habits set off conversations about privacy when renting through the car sharing platform.

(Compiled by Student Fellow Jacob Leiken)